Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Gerrit

I agree. Gerrit looks very useful. Having design discussions on Bugzilla and linking to changesets sounds good.
+1 from me

Should we start the process? Is anyone against it?


On 17/02/2012 2:48 AM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
At the same time Gerrit is a very good code review tool, something
Bugzilla is not. I don't mind seeing design discussions on bugzilla,
and if we make sure we put the link  to the changeset in the bug and
visa versa, navigation between the tools should be easy.

I just want to take advantage of the great git integration that gerrit
provides. Never again should we have to ask someone to update and
resubmit a patch. You simply rebase it from the current branch head.


On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Marc Khouzam<marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
I totally agree with M-A on this.  The discussions on Bugzilla are extremely valuable.

I'm suddenly worried about using Gerrit, now that M-A brings up this point.

Best regards,


----- Original Message -----
From: Marc-Andre Laperle<malaperle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "CDT General developers list."<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 16-02-2012 21:45
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Gerrit

Hi Doug,

Gerrit looks great! My only concern is that it could move too much of
the discussions from Bugzilla to Gerrit. Often when I look at EGit bugs,
I don't see a lot of activity and updates and then I find out everything
is happening on Gerrit. If we adopt it, I think we should make sure
Bugzilla is not too left out.


On 13/02/2012 2:32 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Hey gang,

Gerrit is ready for us to use! Woo hoo!

I haven't taken a look at how to set it up and what it means to our
processes. But it's something that should make our lives easier when
accepting contributions. Let me know what you think and whether and we
we should adopt it.

cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top