On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Sergey Prigogin
<
eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Marc Khouzam <
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Alex and Sergey, this seems like a really cool addition to CDT.
>>
>> For the record, I have to agree with Doug that there really should be a
>> bugzilla
>> associated with commits that contain functionality. There is the aspect
>> of openness
>> where a bugzilla allows others to join in the discussion; and there is the
>> availability
>> of information about the feature. Without the bug, there is no way to get
>> information
>> about the complex commits that come with such a feature.
>
>
> Point taken. In the spirit that better late than never, Alex
> created
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=372551. Please share
> your criticisms and ideas there.
>>
>>
>> Next time :)
>>
>> Marc
>
>
> -sergey
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>> Of Doug Schaefer [
cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: February 24, 2012 12:41 PM
>> To: CDT General developers list.
>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] External-tool-based checkers for Codan
>>
>> Ideally it contains the design discussion you had with the community too
>> ;)
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Alex Ruiz <
alruiz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi Doug,
>> >
>> > I didn't create a bugzilla ticket, but I'll create one. Should the
>> > ticket
>> > point to the commit in git?
>> >
>> > Many thanks,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Doug Schaefer <
cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, Alex. Was there a bugzilla number that documented this work?
>> >>
>> >> Doug.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Alex Ruiz <
alruiz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > Greetings,
>> >> >
>> >> > I've been working on infrastructure for external-tool-based checkers
>> >> > for
>> >> > Codan. The work started some time ago when we wanted to integrate CDT
>> >> > with
>> >> > some code checking tools that we have internally at Google. Then the
>> >> > common
>> >> > pieces were abstracted and now are part of CDT.
>> >> >
>> >> > Many thanks to my teammate and mentor, Sergey Prigogin, for his
>> >> > guidance
>> >> > and
>> >> > for reviewing, improving and committing this work.
>> >> >
>> >> > I wrote a little blog entry explaining this new infrastructure. BTW,
>> >> > the
>> >> > infrastructure includes a checker that integrates with Cppcheck
>> >> > (disabled by
>> >> > default.) You can read the post
>> >> > at
http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2231
>> >> >
>> >> > Feedback is always welcome :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Best regards,
>> >> > -Alex
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > cdt-dev mailing list
>> >> >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cdt-dev mailing list
>> >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev