Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Overholt
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:10 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
> > While you are at it, will gcov and gprof be moved too?
> There are currently no plans to do so.  If we want to talk about a full-scale
> annexing of Linux Tools by CDT then those make sense :)

So far I've really only been thinking about build systems, especially if we have a round of cleaning up the CDT build infrastructure.

I think it is clear though, that a lot of the things going on in Linux Tools is of interest to the general CDT community. Moving things around won't always make sense, unless there is a lot of demand from the non-Linux CDT crowd for these tools. Autotools was obvious because of the MinGW/MSYS support for it.


Back to the top