Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] What happened to the Dom Ast View

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Overholt
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:03 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] What happened to the Dom Ast View
> > It’s probably easier for extension developers to checkout the repo
> > from git and work with that.
> Could you have a separate p2 repo for these features?

That's pretty much the state of things now. I think all our user consumable features are in the train repo with the more advanced stuff in the CDT repo. The main issue would be the need to separate out the source from the SDK into separate features. If someone has time to do that, I'm fine with it.


Back to the top