[cdt-dev] Code Analysis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] Code Analysis

From: Robert Breckner <rbreckner@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vYh2wJ/4VRESHHCwsDKmdVOJb3liO6N1tJTVJMEr8Lpys+hpCKVhHZRCFkShTSu6cFeDazlzsmCNvJsymNzqLFfKqG+q8ZE6ZTEZObIOhoy0N81t7nJS+9mm4LBRgN/AwaUZnkmEpWNFyu0eYn5M6/K4mPsWUiQhTRRTBB7RAP8=;
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In our project we define many custom types such as UINT32, etc. One of those types is VOID for void. The static analysis doesn't seem to recognize these defines and generates a bunch of "No return, in function with returning non-void". Is it possible to get it to recognize these defines? The regular indexer seems to know what they are as pressing F3 on it, takes you directly to the definition.

Thanks

Robert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Code Analysis
  - From: Sergey Prigogin

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Why does cdt-master-nightly looks different from cdt-master-maint?
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Code Analysis
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] Why does cdt-master-nightly looks different from cdt-master-maint?
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Code Analysis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs