+1 on getting a bug for those changes.
They are pretty minor and should be not
problem
Hi Abeer, I suggest you open a bug for this request and provide
a patch.
Cheers, Pawel
On 04/11/2011 04:47 AM, Abeer Bagul
wrote:
Hi
Currently DSF-GDB only defines one register group for
all registers in the backend. In order to define custom register groups, we
can subclass MIRegisters service and define our own groups. However, there
are a few small issues in MIRegisters which makes it difficult to
subclass. Example: The variables fCommandFactory, fRegisterNameCache
are not visible to subclasses. Can there be protected accessor methods for
the same? The methods makeRegisterDMCs(...) can be made protected. In
the method writeRegister(...), the write operation proceeds only if group
number is 0. Because of that, we have to assign 0 to all custom register
groups. This check can be removed to allow custom
groups.
Thanks Abeer Bagul Tensilica India
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|