I see the
values of having a disassembly
editor that insert disassembly instructions under source lines, as well
as
having a disassembly view to be able to display instructions for the
entire
address ranges. These are two different use cases and it depends on the
application the user is dealing with, I don’t have strong opinion
whether
an editor is better than a view or a view is better that an editor. But
if the
editor have all the features of the view, than I would use the editor,
because
editor provides better source and disassembly interleave.
Regards,
Patrick
IMO a better approach
would be to present the
disassembly content in an editor. It's easier to manage multiple
instances of editors than views and it's a more natural place for
disassembly
anyway. This is what Wind River does
in
our product and in CDT you may be able to leverage Mikhail's work from
a few
years ago to make it happen.
Cheers,
Pawel
On 09/29/2010 07:59 AM, Chuong, Patrick
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know
whether it is possible to unlink
the Disassembly view from the Debug view. AFAIK, the Disassembly view
follows
the selection of the Debug view. If unlink is current not supported,
can this
be added?
If unlink can be done or
will be support in the
future, can the Disassembly also have an option to re-evaluate the
_expression_
when the target is suspended?
Thanks,
Patrick
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev