Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] actionSet vs. menu/commands/handlers for refactorings

If there is a reason, I hope it's not a good one.

I'm on a general rampage to streamline UI, so if you have a patch for
us to look at and to try out, please file a bug and we'll (or at least
I) will look at it.


On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Martin Schwab <mschwab@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear CDT crew
> Is there a reason why CDT refactoring menus are hardcoded in
> CRefactoringActionGroup? It's hard to get a new refactoring in there not
> touching this code.
> It seems easy to change the code to use the menus/commands/halders
> extension points. I've attached a patch that changes the rename
> refactoring to clarify what I mean. Would the community accept such a
> change?
> Background: I'd like to lower the integration barrier for new
> refactorings because it seems there was much work done in the past and
> never integrated.
> Regards,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Back to the top