Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Qt Support?

Actually, as I get more into Qt, you don't really need an additional
builder. The makefile ensure it keeps itself up to date.

So all you really need then is a template to generate the .pro and run
the initial qmake. This is getting very close to what I did for
Android. I can start with that if there are no objections.

Doug

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Cool. The things I've quickly thought of is a New Qt Project wizard to
> simplify and control project creation, a qmake builder that runs qmake
> when the project file has changed, and potentially a nicer qmake
> project file editor. And if you want to go the extra mile, some way to
> generate the list of source files that can be included in the project
> file.
>
> I think the UI designer could be left as an external tool, but if you
> guys have a lot of resources to put into that, you could integrate it,
> but then you'd always be playing catchup with the already pretty
> decent Qt Designer.
>
> I'm looking at how Wascana can pick up the Qt install and set the
> paths correctly to launch qmake and find the DLLs at debug time for
> Windows. That shouldn't be a problem on Linux, and I'm not sure of
> Mac. Qt embedded might be different though.
>
> Anyway, that's just my 2 cents. Look forward to seeing the community
> help on this.
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM,  <ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Doug,
>>
>> The short answer is yes we are working on better Qt support and yes you
>> should get started because we want it to be a CDT community effort and we
>> need your help.
>>
>> I'll let Warren give you a more detailed response since he's been thinking
>> about exactly what to do.
>>
>> Regards - Ken
>>
>>> From: Schaefer Doug <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:49:00 +0200
>>> To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: [cdt-dev] Qt Support?
>>>
>>> Qt flew by my vision again today and distracted me. Having got the
>>> Android NDK build system integrated with CDT and enjoying the
>>> experience. I come back to Qt and we should do the same there. Since
>>> Qt is cross platform, it probably fits better under the CDT umbrella.
>>>
>>> So, question mainly to the Nokia guys, is anyone working on better Qt
>>> support for CDT? Or should I get started.
>>>
>>> Doug.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>
>


Back to the top