|Re: [cdt-dev] CDT for Windows, launching, and Wascana|
Well, to be honest, I guess my question was mostly directed at Doug. I should have been clearer about that. He's expressed his strong dislike for the whole launch mechanism. It's just not clear to me what's so out of whack with it. For sure, the concept of launch configurations are hard to digest. But with the context sensitive support now being used in CDT, it seems to me the beginner or novice user doesn't have to deal with them much.
Anyway, a topic for next week. I'm just curious.
At 05:27 PM 4/16/2010, ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I'll be delighted if I find there isn't much to do and that Doug is already
off doing it. I just want to make sure we have this covered in 7.0.
> From: ext John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:09:50 +0200
> To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT for Windows, launching, and Wascana
> I feel like I'm missing something. Last time I checked, I created a C
> project, built it, hit the debug button, and...bingo, I was in the
> debugger with the program stopped at the main() of my program. The
> only snag was the lack of source with Cygwin, but obviously that's
> not an issue for Wascana.
> This hassle-free workflow was made possible by the context-sensitive
> launch logic that you and Darin worked on. So, what am I missing?
> Where is the opportunity for improvement? The only thing I can think
> of is the fact that gdb had to be in the PATH, but Doug is apparently
> already focused on addressing that.
> At 05:02 PM 4/16/2010, ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Content-Language: en-US
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> In the next couple weeks I want to start looking at the out of the
>> box launch experience for someone who downloads CDT for Windows.
>> There has been some discussion about this and a few relevant bugs
>> but I'd like to step back and look at it fresh from start to finish.
>> So my first question is, what's the status of Wascana? I'm planning
>> to skip over the issue of how people who download CDT for Windows
>> get Wascana, assuming we'll tackle that separately. So since it
>> sounds like you have been doing some new work on Wascana I wanted to
>> see if there is there a new update site I can pull it from?
>> Thanks - Ken
>> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev mailing list
Back to the top