Re: [cdt-dev] Support for "target-detach" and "target-disconnect"

[John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 12:37 PM 4/14/2010, Pawel Piech wrote:
> John Cortell wrote:
> > Looking at the gdb documentation for detach and disconnect, I'm 
> > thinking the 'disconnect' command is aligned with my expectations. 
> > So my first reaction is a +1 for a new action that always resumes 
> > the target upon giving up control over it (i.e., Detach). But that 
> > makes me wonder...is that worthy of an action? Couldn't I just hit 
> > resume and then do a disconnect. Is the use case strong enough to 
> > warrant yet another run control action? I'm thinking no, but if 
> > there's some advantage besides saving a click, I would be for the new action.
> I agree that an action is a heavy-weight solution here.  Could it be 
> solved as a preference to the disconnect action behavior?  It could 
> even bring up a dialog with a "remember my decision" option.
> -Pawel

+1