RE: [cdt-dev] Nightly build broken

[John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds like we should move the launch plugin into the new, proposed
dedicated gdb feature. That would address your long-standing
problem.

John

At 03:46 PM 4/9/2010, Warren.Paul@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/related;
         boundary="_005_5ABC9C306CCC574887C58E7EAC03A28C2A496C3CBDNOKEUMSG02mgd_";
         type="multipart/alternative"

I find fault in the fact that the launch plugin is in a gnu feature.  I've been meaning to raise this just this week actually, so good timing. :)
 
The launch plugin isn't really GNU specific, and is used in our products which have nothing GNU.  So with the current feature structure we basically have to include that feature but hide any UI from the MI plugins.  Ideally we'd move the launch plugin into the platform or core feature, and then the new GDB plugins could be added to the existing gnu.debug feature.  That kind of forces DSF based products to include the CDI plugins I guess though.  If those were added without moving the launch plugin, that's two more plugins that we don't want that we get included and presumably more UI we have to hide.
 
Ahh..  I don't know what the best solution is, but giving you some more things to think about.  :)
 
Thanks,
Warren
 

---

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext John Cortell

Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 3:28 PM

To: CDT General developers list.; CDT General developers list.

Cc: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx; cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Nightly build broken

Given that existing DSF-feature --> CDI-feature dependency, your suggestion makes sense to me. If someone finds fault with it, then the dedicated feature will be the way to go.

John

At 03:23 PM 4/9/2010, Vivian Kong wrote:

Actually it looks like org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.dsf already have some dependencies on org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.debug feature (it depends on org.eclipse.cdt.launch, which is in o.e.cdt.gnu.debug)...so maybe we can move o.e.cdt.gdb* to the o.e.cdt.gnu.debug feature?

Regards,

Vivian Kong

IBM Eclipse CDT

IBM Canada Toronto Lab

 Vivian Kong---04/09/2010 03:56:52 PM---Hi everyone, The nightly build is broken:

From:

Vivian Kong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA

To:

cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Date:

04/09/2010 03:56 PM

Subject:

[cdt-dev] Nightly build broken

Sent by:

cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi everyone,

The nightly build is broken:

/opt/public/download-staging.priv/tools/cdt/releng/org.eclipse.cdt/all/org.eclipse.cdt.releng/tools/org.eclipse.releng.basebuilder/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.6.0.v20091204/scripts/genericTargets.xml:106: Bundle org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.core_7.0.0.201004090808 failed to resolve.:

Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.cdt.gdb_7.0.0.

The new cdt.gdb.* plugins are missing from the cdt.map file. I'll add them in.

However, both features org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.debug and org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.dsf have dependencies on the new org.eclipse.cdt.gdb plugin. Should the new plugin be part of the cdt.platform feature instead of cdt.gnu.dsf feature?

Regards,

Vivian Kong

IBM Eclipse CDT

IBM Canada Toronto Lab_______________________________________________

cdt-dev mailing list

cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________

cdt-dev mailing list

cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev