[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"
|
I had volunteered to jettison the old view, but I'll be more than happy
to yield that fun work to you, Ken :-)
John
At 03:44 PM 3/10/2010, ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_C7BD6ECE209FAkenryallnokiacom_"
I think we are now at the point where the old disassembly view can be
removed and the DSF version can be renamed.
Let me know if you think I have overlooked something. I would like to do
this in time for M6.
Thanks - Ken
From: "Ryall Ken (Nokia-D/Austin)"
<ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list."
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 23:34:25 +0100
To:
"cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF
Disassembly"
From: ext Pawel Piech
<pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list."
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:07:57 +0100
To: "CDT General developers list."
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF
Disassembly"
- As far as this specific case, I think the toggle target factory needs
to be contributed in common to avoid the target ID issue as you pointed
out. However, we could use some other mechanism to indicate that a
give debugger implementation is using C Breakpoints (see
ToggleCBreakpointsTargetFactory.getDefaultToggleTarget() for an
example). Then for debuggers that don't use C Breakpoints their
factor could be disabled or at least they would not be the default (as in
the editor).
I created bug
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=305071 for moving the
target factory to dsf. I attached an initial patch but need some help
with how getDefaultToggleTarget() should work. Details are in the
bug.
Thanks - Ken
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev