Re: [cdt-dev] FW: Fixing some Debug feature-parity bugs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] FW: Fixing some Debug feature-parity bugs

From: John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:17:56 -0600
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Marc,

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=248595

is a CDI vs DSF parity bug I signed up for. I'm not sure it really is a parity issue, since the CDI solution

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=294874

never got committed. While this is an important capability, I don't think we should be including it in the "parity" effort since it really does not constitute a hurdle in adopting DSF-GDB as the default debugger over CDI-GDB.

John

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [cdt-dev] FW: Fixing some Debug feature-parity bugs
  - From: Marc Khouzam

References:
- [cdt-dev] FW: Fixing some Debug feature-parity bugs
  - From: Marc Khouzam

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Improve Indexer on large project
Next by Date: RE: [cdt-dev] FW: Fixing some Debug feature-parity bugs
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] FW: Fixing some Debug feature-parity bugs
Next by thread: RE: [cdt-dev] FW: Fixing some Debug feature-parity bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs