Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] MinGW gdb


Our team isn't working on any of these bugs just now. I added one more bug
to the wiki that is currently assigned to me anyway. Before we plan to work
on any of them I'll check to make sure someone isn't working on them

- Ken

> From: ext Dominique Toupin <dominique.toupin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:14:45 +0100
> To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] MinGW gdb
> Hi Ken,
> Identifying which bugs your team is working on would be useful, other people
> will be able to choose other bugs.
> Please send the list, we will update the wiki accordingly:
> Thanks!
> Dominique
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: 4-Feb-10 12:30
>> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] MinGW gdb
>> In order for CDI to really be deprecated DSF needs to reach
>> feature parity.
>> We outlined these issues at our last face-to-face meeting:
>> But there is still some work left to be done in DSF. We'll be
>> working on some of these for CDT 7.0 as we need our DSF-EDC
>> based debugger to have the same features as our current CDI
>> based debugger.
>> - Ken
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Back to the top