Re: [cdt-dev] Going to 3.0 for org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb

[John Cortell <rat042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

At 08:27 AM 2/9/2010, Marc Khouzam wrote:

Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
         boundary="_000_F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC515FAAFE0CEUSAACMS0703e_"

Hi,
 
I would like to move the plugin org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb from 2.0 to 3.0.
The reason is that to fix Bug 249165 (Resume at line) and Bug 249162 (Move at line), I need to add methods
to the DSF-GDB runControl service, which requires adding methods to the interface IMIRunControl interface.
 
Since this interface is part of dsf.gdb only and not DSF, I don't think it is being used outside DSF-GDB.
So, instead of getting into the whole IMIRunControl2 pattern, I'd rather just make change directly.
 
Anyone thinks is a bad idea?
 
P.S. I would also remove Deprecated interface in the same effort

---

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer

Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:58 PM

To: CDT General developers list.

Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] RE: Removal of depracated IReverse interfaces

Every plug-in has their own version. There's nothing wrong with that. And with that the decision on when to change major version also resides with the plug-in and the people working on it.

We've made a general decision to allow API changes for CDT 7 if you really need to and communicate those changes to the community.

Doug.

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Marc Khouzam < marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It just hit me that although CDT is going to 7.0, DSF and DSF/GDB have their own versions and are moving

from 2.0 to 2.1.  This prevents me from removing deprecated interfaces.

 

Should we align DSF/DSF-GDB with the CDT versioning decision?

Or maybe not DSF, but maybe the two DSF-GDB plugins?

 

Thanks for any input

 

Marc

 

---

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:40 AM

To: CDT General developers list.

Subject: [cdt-dev] Removal of depracated IReverse interfaces

Hi,

 

In 7.0 I've moved the IReverse* interfaces for the differen reverse debugging commands from dsf.gdb to debug.core.

The old interfaces are marked as deprecated, but I would like to remove them.

 

They are:

org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IReverseStepOverHandler

org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IReverseStepIntoHandler

org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IReverseResumeHandler

org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IReverseToggleHandler

org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IUncallHandler

 

Anyone objects or feels it is better to leave them?

 

Thanks

 

Marc

 

 

_______________________________________________

cdt-dev mailing list

cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev