[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Going to 3.0 for org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb
|
+1
At 08:27 AM 2/9/2010, Marc Khouzam wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC515FAAFE0CEUSAACMS0703e_"
Hi,
I would like to move the plugin
org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb from 2.0 to 3.0.
The reason is that to fix Bug 249165 (Resume at line) and Bug 249162
(Move at line), I need to add methods
to the DSF-GDB runControl service, which requires adding methods to the
interface IMIRunControl interface.
Since this interface is part of dsf.gdb only
and not DSF, I don't think it is being used outside DSF-GDB.
So, instead of getting into the whole IMIRunControl2 pattern, I'd rather
just make change directly.
Anyone thinks is a bad idea?
P.S. I would also remove Deprecated
interface in the same effort
- From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug
Schaefer
- Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:58 PM
- To: CDT General developers list.
- Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] RE: Removal of depracated IReverse
interfaces
- Every plug-in has their own version. There's nothing wrong with that.
And with that the decision on when to change major version also resides
with the plug-in and the people working on it.
- We've made a general decision to allow API changes for CDT 7 if you
really need to and communicate those changes to the community.
- Doug.
- On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Marc Khouzam
<
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
- It just hit me that although CDT is
going to 7.0, DSF and DSF/GDB have their own versions and are moving
- from 2.0 to 2.1. This prevents me from removing deprecated
interfaces.
-
- Should we align DSF/DSF-GDB with the CDT
versioning decision?
- Or maybe not DSF, but maybe the two DSF-GDB plugins?
-
- Thanks for any input
-
- Marc
-
- From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc
Khouzam
- Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:40 AM
- To: CDT General developers list.
- Subject: [cdt-dev] Removal of depracated IReverse interfaces
- Hi,
-
- In 7.0 I've moved the IReverse* interfaces for the differen reverse
debugging commands from dsf.gdb to debug.core.
- The old interfaces are marked as deprecated, but I would like to
remove them.
-
- They are:
- org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IReverseStepOverHandler
- org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IReverseStepIntoHandler
- org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IReverseResumeHandler
- org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IReverseToggleHandler
- org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.actions.IUncallHandler
-
- Anyone objects or feels it is better to leave them?
-
- Thanks
-
- Marc
-
-
- _______________________________________________
- cdt-dev mailing list
- cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
-
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev