[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
> Sent: February-03-10 5:53 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] MinGW gdb
[...]
> Sure. However, my plan for the next couple of weeks is to
> take another look at our launch story. I hate the fact we
> have a default. It should be related to the toolchain that
> the user is using for their project. Then when you define
> your toolchain, you can say what debugger and integration
> framework to use.
Are you talking about end-users defining the toolchain or
vendors? If we're talking about end-users, then
I think we all agreed it was not a good final solution
to make the users _have_ to choose a debugger integration
framework. That is why we have the default.
But won't the same problem come up when defining a toolchain?
Which debugger integration will be the default when you are
defining a toolchain?
I'm thinking we need to have default for the people that fit
in the category: "I just want to debug my application".
And for those people, I think the default should be
the integration that gives them the most debugging features.
Thanks
Marc