[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] C++0x syntax
|
Cool. Thanks all! I don't think it's critical this be completed by 6.1. If we can support the most commonly use features (or the ones most likely to be used), I think that'll be good progress. Please make sure you're co-ordinating with yourselves so that work isn't duplicated.
Cheers,
Doug.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Schorn, Markus
<Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In addition to Sergey's effort, I will also spend some
time on extending the parser to support C++0x throughout the next year. I
am not yet sure whether will have complete support in the next
CDT release, though.
Markus.
Unfortunately, I don't think we have C++0x on the plans. It's going
to be a while before it rolls out commercially so there's no real pressure for
it except for early adopters like yourself. Anyone interested in getting a
start on this?
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Nathan Ridge
<zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello,
I
just recently started using gcc 4.4's C++0x features, and I noticed that the
Eclipse CDT editor highlights as syntax errors certain statements that were
not valid in C++98 but are in C++0x (e.g. "enum class"
declarations).
I was wondering whether there are any plans to
implement an option for the parser to recognize C++0x code (or perhaps there
already is such an option, I just can't find it)?
On a related note,
I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you guys for your awesome work -
in my opinion, Eclipse CDT is hands-down the best IDE for cross-platform C++
development. Among many other things, kudos for supporting semantic
highlighting. I know this must have been difficult to implement for C++, and
I've yet to see another editor that can do it.
Thanks,
Nate.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev