Re: [cdt-dev] Is it ok to break the build of CDT on 3.5?

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, my mind was backwards. But I think it's straight now.

Yes, everyone should start testing 6.1 with 3.6. I don't think there's been much change there but let's give it a little time to make sure everyone's ready. Ken, how long do you guys need?

:D

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, <ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Marc,

Would you mind sitting on the patch a little longer, maybe until 3.6M3? We
would like a chance to try out the 3.6 builds and plan for any issues we
might find.

Thanks -  Ken

> From: ext Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:39:50 +0200
> To: "'CDT General developers list.'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Is it ok to break the build of CDT on 3.5?

>
> Hi,
>
> with 3.6M2 platform gives us a way to have asynchronous commands.
> See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=284363
> Using this means that if a command is taking a long time, the UI won't hang.
>
> As part of bug 275687 (Reverse commands block the UI thread)
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=275687
> I've migrated the Reverse Debugging commands (reverse steps, reverse resume,
> etc)
> to this new infrastructure.  Also, I moved these commands from DSF-GDB down to
> cdt.debug.ui to allow for other integrations to use them.
>
> The problem is that if I check-in that patch, some plugins will no longer
> build
> with 3.5, you would need 3.6M2.
>
> I wondered what is our approach to this?
> This patch is in no way urgent, but I'd like to eventually commit it.
>
> Any guidance?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Marc
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev