[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] DSF independent of CDT ?
|
Hi,
I agree that the DSF-GDB part need not be independant of
CDT. I would like it if we could consolidate the code
But it always comes down to what time
allows.
As always, patches are welcome.
Thanks
Marc
I guess from my angle, DSF/GDB is fairly separate from DSF proper.
I think we need to keep open the opportunity to push DSF down into the debug
platform, especially as more debuggers are built on it. For example, I plan on
spending a little time to see if putting Java debugging on DSF would help with
JNI debugging. But that is separate from the GDB support, which probably
should be allowed to be CDT specific. And for Nokia's debugger, it's really
whatever you want to do with it.
Just my thoughts...
Doug.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:49 PM,
<Ling.5.Wang@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
Pawel and Marc,
I remember DSF was originally design with one
intension of not being dependent on CDT, thus DSF launch delegates are not
derived from AbstractCLaunchDelegate, and DSF/GDB has its own copies of
launch config tabs (such as CMainTab and DebuggerTab) instead of deriving
from those in CDT.
Now as DSF being moved into CDT, I'm wondering if
we still want to keep the independency ? Or is it better we consolidate
those code ? For instance we in Nokia added a feature in CDT and now
we have to kind of copy the code to EDC (the new DSF based debugger)
unless we change the LaunchDelegate inheritance
tree.
Thanks.
-
Ling_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing
list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
