Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Stupid branching question

Uh, yeah. cdt_6_0 is for 6.0 stuff. :).

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rohrbach, Randy
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 9:59 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Stupid branching question
> Folks
>    Just want to make sure I understand the branching.
>    For cdt 6.0.1 we are using the cdt_6_0 branch and just
> checking in to this branch.

Yes, that is what I understood too, and that is what I've been

>    Of course all edits will be checked in to HEAD as well.

And that too :-)

>    Is this correct.
>    Thanks
> Randy
cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top