|Re: [cdt-dev] RIP Wascana, Build System discussion|
Chris Recoskie wrote:
I think your statement that there is little commercial interest in managed build is wrong.
We use it in our commercial products, but we're a small company compared to some/most. :)
I think the problem is that the design and implementation were half-baked in a lot of places, and revolved so heavily around the GNU tools that it's hard to get it to work for anything else.
Yes, and it's almost entirely in the plugin.xml, so there's not much in the way of javadoc or type information to indicate what you have done wrong (in the extremely likely event of making a mistake). It also makes the huge assumption that everything is an external tool to be spawned and no part of the build process happens in Java/Eclipse itself. To my mind, it would be better as a framework of simple Java classes that are referenced in plugin.xml. This would be much easier to work with and extend.
I'm not planning to drop MBS any time soon. Gut it? Maybe. If anything I'd like to eventually drop makefile generation as a feature, but last time I suggested that, there was practically a riot.
Total agreement from me, the MBS and internal builder are very useful. Pete -- Peter J. Vidler Senior Systems Developer, TTE Systems Ltd p.vidler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +44 (0)116 223 1684 Registered address: 106 New Walk, Leicester, LE1 7EA Company number: 05058157 VAT registration: 913 4859 12 www.tte-systems.com
Back to the top