Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] DSF depended on CDT
I assume you mean CDI, not CDT. DSF is now an intergral part of the CDT. You can add as many dependencies as you'd like. However I understand the need to eliminate dependencies between DSF and CDI so that adopters can pick one or the other for their products and have the one they are not using not show up.
 
Doug.

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 3:37 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] DSF depended on CDT

Sorry, I thought you were using DSF-GDB.
Yes, it would be possible to remove the dependencies on the CDT from the
DSF framework.  In fact I believe this is part of the long term plan for DSF,
but I don't have more details.  Maybe someone else would know better.
 
Marc
 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuong, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:47 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] DSF depended on CDT

I am using DSF framework for my own debugger, non-gdb.

 

Yes, the extra CDT plugins were activated.

 

Thanks,

Patrick

 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:42 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] DSF depended on CDT

 

Hi,

 

We re-use some of the CDT constructs for convenience. 

 

Are you simply using the DSF framework for your own debugger, or are you using the full

DSF-GDB (launching and debugging with GDB)?

 

I'm not sure what you mean by "CDIDebugModel was sucked in"

Do you mean that the extra CDT plugins were activated when you were using DSF?

 

Thanks

 

marc

 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuong, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:00 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] DSF depended on CDT

Hi Marc,

 

Just to reiterate what you mean, DSF is depended on CDT and it is part of the CDT installation.

 

There is a hand full of dependency on CDT, i.e IAddress, Addr64, ICBreakpoint, ICBreakpointExtension, CSourceLookupDirectory, CDebugImages. Can these interfaces and implementations be redefined in DSF and the implementation be re-implemented in DSF? So that DSF can remove the CDT dependency for the debugging part.

 

While I am debugging DSF code for setting a CLineBreakpoint, CDIDebugModel was sucked in for the breakpoint marker, as well as the CDebugModemPresentation. It looks like DSF is depended in CDT in a number of areas.

 

I am trying to make sense of the relationship between DSF and CDT. Are there any reasons why DSF is relying on some of the CDT interfaces and implementation?

 

Thanks again,

Patrick

 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:57 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] DSF depended on CDT

 

Hi,

 

DSF and DSF-GDB have now been moved to the CDT project.

What that means is that, starting with Galileo (eclipse 3.5) when installing CDT you will automatically

get DSF and DSF-GDB.

 

There are no other dependencies.

 

Marc

 

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuong, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:08 AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] DSF depended on CDT

Hi,

 

I am browsing through the DSF plugins and I see that DSF depended on several CDT plugins, is this a temporary solution? Will this dependency goes away in future DSF release? Is there any other runtime dependency that you can point out that is not explicitly defined in the plugin manifest file?

 

Thanks,
Patrick

Back to the top