[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Are these tests valid?
|
The testcase needs to be corrected. By further improving
the parser, we will encounter more of these.
Markus.
The following two tests seem to be invalid and pass due to bugs in
conversions.
// class A
{};
//
// class B {
// public:
// void foo(const A&
b); should be A* instead of
A&
// };
//
// template<typename
T>
// class C : public B
{
// public:
// void foo(T *t) {
//
B::foo(static_cast<A*>(t));
// }
// };
public void
testMemberLookupThroughDeferredClassBase() throws Exception {
BindingAssertionHelper ba= new
BindingAssertionHelper(getAboveComment(), true);
ba.assertNonProblem("foo(s", 3);
}
// class X {
// template <typename
S> X(S s);
// };
//
// void test(X
a); should be X* instead of X
// void bla(int g) {
// test(new X(g));
// }
public void
testBug239586_ClassCast() throws Exception {
parseAndCheckBindings(getAboveComment(),
ParserLanguage.CPP);
}
If nobody objects, I'm going to fix them.
-sergey
