[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] CConfigurationData and friends
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vladimir Prus
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 1:00 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CConfigurationData and friends
>
> On Wednesday 05 November 2008 17:30:00 James Blackburn wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Vladimir Prus
> > <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > > As far as I see, the CConfigurationDescription class holds an
> > > instance of CConfigurationData and relays most of
> operations there,
> > > and there some classes derived from CConfigurationData,
> for example
> > > BuildConfigurationData. The latter class is created in the
> > > constructor of the Configuration class.
> > >
> > > Can somebody explain the rationale behind this design --
> as it seems
> > > slightly more complex than it could be. For example, why managed
> > > build cannot have class ManagedBuildConfigurationDescription,
> > > derived from IConfigurationDescription/CConfigurationDescription,
> > > that does basically the same thing that
> BuildConfigurationData does now?
> >
> > I think part of the design is that bare-bones configuration
> > descriptions live in cdt.core while the build system uses real
> > configurations.
> >
> > > On a related topic, what is the purpose of the CDataProxy
> class. It
> > > has no comments so it's a bit hard to understand what
> problems it is
> > > solving.
> >
> > I agree this stuff is very opaque. Is there any hope that someone
> > from Intel (or indeed anyone with knowledge of the
> > internal.core.settings) might be on today's CDT call? Doug, is the
> > Project Model on the agenda for discussion? It'd be great to start
> > moving in the direction of a project model that's understandable to
> > the extended CDT community.
>
> Any update on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Volodya
Sorry for the delay in responding it's been a pretty fun and busy
Eclipse Summit Europe.
We are certainly in need of help with the build components of the CDT.
Essentially much of the knowledge on this Description stuff has been
lost. There are guys trying to figure it all out and hopefully we can
get some momentum back there. James seems to be having the most success
so far but we have a long way to go.
Doug.