> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Warnings and
SuppressWarnings
> Importance: Low
>
> I would never veto
something that people clearly want.
>
> May I make a few more
suggestions (based on the current
> settings in the UI
> plugin)
:
>
> redundant null check -> warning
> unnecessary
else statement -> warning
> redundant super interface ->
warning
> usage of raw type -> warning
> missing @override
annotation -> warning
> missing @deprecated annotation ->
warning unused import -> error
>
>
> Mike
Kucera
> Software Developer
> IBM CDT Team, Toronto
>
mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
"Schorn,
Markus"
>
>
<Markus.Schorn@wi
>
>
ndriver.com>
>
To
> Sent by:
"CDT General
>
developers list."
>
cdt-dev-bounces@e <
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
clipse.org>
cc
>
>
>
> Subject
>
04/08/2008 04:56
RE: [cdt-dev] Warnings
> and
>
AM
SuppressWarnings
>
>
>
>
>
>
Please respond
to
>
>
"CDT General
>
>
developers list."
>
>
<cdt-dev@eclipse.
>
>
org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Ok, I'd like to increase the warning levels:
> "Enum type constant not
covered on switch": none -> warning
> "Null pointer access":
warning -> error
> "Potential null pointer access":
none -> warning
> "switch case
fall-through":
> none -> warning
>
> Please reply, if
you have an objection.
>
>
> Mike, if you don't explicitly
veto this, I'll enable the
> shared warning-settings for the
core-plugin, also.
>
> Markus.
>
>
> >
-----Original Message-----
> > From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mike Kucera
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:59
AM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re:
[cdt-dev] Warnings and SuppressWarnings
> > Importance: Low
>
>
> > +1
> >
> > I like the idea of turning
some warnings into errors.
> >
> > Mike Kucera
>
> Software Developer
> > IBM CDT Team, Toronto
> >
mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx> >
>
>
> >
> >
> >
Elena Laskavaia
> >
> >
<ELaskavaia@qnx.c
> >
>
> om>
> >
To
> >
Sent by:
"CDT General
> > developers
list."
> >
cdt-dev-bounces@e <
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> >
clipse.org> >
cc
> >
> >
>
>
> > Subject
> >
04/07/2008 12:38
Re: [cdt-dev] Warnings
> > and
> >
PM
SuppressWarnings
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> >
> >
Please respond to
> >
> >
"CDT General
> >
> >
developers list."
>
>
> >
<cdt-dev@eclipse.
> >
> >
org>
> >
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> >
> >
> > I think it is good idea. But we
should enable as much as we can and
> > turn some warning into
errors, such as unused import.
> >
> > Schorn, Markus
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I am
getting a bunch of warnings in the core-plugin of
> the
following
> > > kind: Unnecessary @SuppressWarnings. I assume
this is because my
> > > compiler warning settings differ from
the ones of others.
> > >
> > > Therefore I suggest
to use a common set of warnings for all
> > of us and
> >
> check it into CVS (like we are doing this in the cdt.ui
plugin).
> > >
> > > Has anyone objections against
this? I'd start out with the same
> > > settings as we are using
for the ui-plugin.
> > >
> > > Markus.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > >
cdt-dev mailing list
> > >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing
list
> >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
>
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing
list
> >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev
mailing list
>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing
list
>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev
mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev