Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] RE: Bugzilla 189335

I'm indifferent... either name is fine by me.



Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto

             <mikhail.sennikov                                          To
             sky@xxxxxxxxx>            "Sergey Prigogin"               
             Sent by:                  <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>   
             cdt-dev-bounces@e                                          cc
                   "CDT General developers list."  
             08/06/2007 02:04          [cdt-dev] RE: Bugzilla 189335   
             Please respond to                                         
               "CDT General                                            
             developers list."                                         

Hi Sergey,

Looks like we have forgotten to reply to your mail.. Sorry for the delayed
response.. I could easily change the ?Include paths? to ?Include
directories? in case everyone agrees with this change.
Does everyone think that ?Include directories? is a better name than
?Include paths??


From: Sergey Prigogin [mailto:eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:24 AM
To: Sennikovsky, Mikhail; Krasilnikov, Oleg
Cc: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: Bugzilla 189335

Mikhail & Oleg,
Could please one of you apply the patch attached to 189302 or change
"Include paths" label to "Include directories" on "Paths and symbols" page
before RC3 goes out. Current title, "Include paths", does not make much
sense since the control shows individual include directories, which only
together constitute a path, but still not "paths".

cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top