RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access

[Janees Elamkulam <janees.ek@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Considering performance, this method
does a walk on ast. were as ICPPInternalBinding function has them cached
as member fields.

- Janees

"Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

03-05-07 01:12 PM

Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access

There is a public way to do this:
 
IBinding binding;
IASTTranslationUnit ast;
use: ast.getDeclarationsInAST(binding),
ast.getDefinitionsInAST(binding).
 
Markus.

---

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Janees Elamkulam
Sent: Donnerstag, 03. Mai 2007 07:42
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access


I would like to access the getDefinition() and getDeclarations() methods
defined by this interface. 

- Janees

Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

30-04-07 05:02 PM

Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access

These interfaces are internal for a reason. Can you explain why you need
access to them. Which methods do you need. 
  
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com

---

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Janees Elamkulam
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 7:19 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access 
  

My team too like to get ICInternalBinding and ICPPInternalBinding as public
interface.  Converting them to ICBinding and ICPPBinding would be
nice. 

- Janees

Andrew Niefer <aniefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

27-04-07 10:50 PM

Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access

 

There is an internal interface ICInternalBinding that has this method.  It probably shouldn't be added to IFunction as that affects C++ classes as well.  Consider changing ICInternalBinding into a public ICBinding instead.

-Andrew

Beth Tibbitts <tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/27/2007 12:53 PM

Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access

 

>Are there things missing from IFunction?
Yes.
CFunction.getPhysicalNode() exists but IFunction.getPhysicalNode() does
not.



...Beth

Beth Tibbitts  (859) 243-4981  (TL 545-4981)
High Productivity Tools / Parallel Tools  http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM T.J.Watson Research Center
Mailing Address:  IBM Corp., 455 Park Place, Lexington, KY 40511


                                                                       
         Doug Schaefer                                                
         <DSchaefer@xxxxxx                                            
         m>                                                         To
         Sent by:                  "CDT General developers list."      
         cdt-dev-bounces@e         <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>              
         clipse.org                                                 cc
                                                                       
                                                               Subject
         04/27/2007 11:37          RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access    
         AM                                                            
                                                                       
                                                                       
         Please respond to                                            
           "CDT General                                                
         developers list."                                            
         <cdt-dev@eclipse.                                            
               org>                                                    
                                                                       
                                                                       




Are there things missing from IFunction? If so we should expand that. In
general, no one should be using the internal classes, only the DOM itself.

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Beth Tibbitts
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:34 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access
>
> How do I do static analysis without accessing things like this?
> Do I just do it anyway and consider myself "internally privileged" ??  :)
>
> What audience is "internal" aimed at?
>
> ...Beth
>
> Beth Tibbitts  (859) 243-4981  (TL 545-4981)
> High Productivity Tools / Parallel Tools  http://eclipse.org/ptp
> IBM T.J.Watson Research Center
> Mailing Address:  IBM Corp., 455 Park Place, Lexington, KY 40511
>
>
>
>              Doug Schaefer
>              <DSchaefer@xxxxxx
>              m>
To
>              Sent by:                  "CDT General developers list."
>              cdt-dev-bounces@e         <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>              clipse.org
cc
>
>
Subject
>              04/27/2007 11:26          RE: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access
>              AM
>
>
>              Please respond to
>                "CDT General
>              developers list."
>              <cdt-dev@eclipse.
>                    org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CFunction is internal, no?
>
> Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
> Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of Beth Tibbitts
> > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:25 AM
> > To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [cdt-dev] Discouraged Access
> >
> >
> > The code I appended for my previous problem solution
> > (http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cdt-dev/msg09602.html)
> > exhibits what I've seen various (many, many) other places in my use of
> CDT
> > 4.0:
> >
> > Discouraged access: The type CFunction is not accessible due to
> > restriction
> > on required library C:
> >  \ecl\eclipse-3.3M6cdt40M6\eclipse\plugins
> > \org.eclipse.cdt.core_4.0.0.200703302000.jar
> >
> > Since I'm using the CDT APIs for my analysis, why shouldn't I be using
> > these APIs?.
> >
> > ...Beth
> >
> > Beth Tibbitts  (859) 243-4981  (TL 545-4981)
> > High Productivity Tools / Parallel Tools  http://eclipse.org/ptp
> > IBM T.J.Watson Research Center
> > Mailing Address:  IBM Corp., 455 Park Place, Lexington, KY 40511
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev