Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Internal builder still experimental?

Hi Doug,
is there a reason, why with new mingw toolset the makefile builder isn't selectable? Internal builder is quite good and should be the default builder, but I need generated makefiles for my cruisecontrol build-system and I think that the user should have the two options to build. Or are there any problems with mingw and makefile-builder?

Best regards
Gerrit Brehmer

----- Original Message ----
From: Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>
To: CDT General developers list. <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 7:57:01 PM
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Internal builder still experimental?


The internal builder is no longer experimental. It is the default builder
for the MinGW integration (so people don't have to distribute MSYS with
their MinGW tool chains). Please raise a bug on the wording and any problems
found with the internal builder.

Thanks,
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jason Montojo
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:39 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Internal builder still experimental?
> 
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> When I build a managed project in CDT, I get the following messages in the
> console:
> 
> **** Build of configuration Debug for project zxc ****
> 
> **** Internal Builder is used for build               ****
> **** NOTE: Internal Builder is experimental currently ****
> 
> Should we keep this wording for the 4.0 release?  Saying it's experimental
> could potentially scare away some users.  At the same time, users would
> have a bit more patience with it since they might not expect it to be
> release quality.  I'm wondering what everyone else's thoughts are on this.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Montojo
> IBM CDT Team
> IBM Toronto Lab
> 905-413-5228
> jmontojo@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


Back to the top