Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[cdt-dev] Re: Dependencies for post-build step

Hi Mikhail,
  I'm using an earlier release - CDT version 3.0.2
Looks like it's been fixed on the main branch (and 3.1?)
Would it be a 'not-so-wise' idea for me to make a hack in 3.0.2?
I guess I should consider migrating to 3.1
Is there some article/documentation on what I need to consider/take care of while migrating?
(I looked on but couldn't find it).
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:39:06 +0400
From: "Sennikovsky, Mikhail" <mikhail.sennikovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Dependencies for post-build step
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Delicia,

What CDT version are you using?
I do not get a full rebuild when I modify a post-build step with the CDT
sources from HEAD.



From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Delicia
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:28 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] Dependencies for post-build step


  I have a managed make C project (executable), which has successfully built.
I make a small modification to the post-build step and get:

**** Full rebuild of configuration Debug for project CDT_hello ****
make -k clean all 

Shouldn't the post-build step be "incremental", and not do a clean rebuild?

I looked at the generated makefile, it has:
# All Target
all: CDT_hello.exe

# Tool invocations
CDT_hello.exe: $(OBJS) $(USER_OBJS)
 $(MAKE) --no-print-directory post-build


Shouldn't it rather be:
all: CDT_hello.exe post-build

# Tool invocations
CDT_hello.exe: $(OBJS) $(USER_OBJS)

post-build: CDT_hello.exe

Also, "post-build" is listed as a SECONDARY target, not sure on the
implications of this part.

Back to the top