|
Hi Mikhail,
I'm using an earlier release - CDT
version 3.0.2
Looks like it's been fixed on the main branch (and
3.1?)
Would it be a 'not-so-wise' idea for me to make a
hack in 3.0.2?
I guess I should consider migrating to
3.1
Is there some article/documentation on what I need
to consider/take care of while migrating?
(I looked on eclipse.org/cdt but couldn't find
it).
Thanks,
Delicia.
------------------------------
Message:
3
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:39:06 +0400
From: "Sennikovsky, Mikhail"
<mikhail.sennikovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:
RE: [cdt-dev] Dependencies for post-build step
To: "CDT General developers
list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<B868AC247BCBC441B1B4F378A325E47D49773B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Delicia,
What CDT version are
you using?
I do not get a full rebuild when I modify a post-build step with
the CDT
sources from
HEAD.
Mikhail
________________________________
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Delicia
Sent:
Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:28 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[cdt-dev] Dependencies for post-build step
Hi,
I have
a managed make C project (executable), which has successfully built.
I make
a small modification to the post-build step and get:
**** Full rebuild
of configuration Debug for project CDT_hello ****
make -k clean
all
Shouldn't the post-build step be "incremental", and
not do a clean rebuild?
I looked at the generated makefile, it
has:
# All Target
all: CDT_hello.exe
# Tool
invocations
CDT_hello.exe: $(OBJS)
$(USER_OBJS)
.....
.....
$(MAKE) --no-print-directory
post-build
post-build:
....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Shouldn't
it rather be:
all: CDT_hello.exe post-build
# Tool
invocations
CDT_hello.exe: $(OBJS)
$(USER_OBJS)
.....
.....
post-build:
CDT_hello.exe
....
Also, "post-build" is listed as a
SECONDARY target, not sure on the
implications of this
part.
Thanks,
Delicia.
|
