The multi-version support is intended to
support a known set of versions - for example a 1.0 version of a tool chain and
a 2.0 version. Both versions can be installed on a machine and different
configurations can be created that use the different versions. A
converter can also be supplied for when a user wants to update configurations that
use the 1.0 tool chain to use the 2.0 tool chain. Typically the 1.0 and
2.0 tool chains might support a different set of options. The different
versions can also implement a configuration environment provider to properly
set up the build environment (paths) for the different versions.
To answer your question Doug, yes, isToolChainSupported
is intended to be implemented by a tool integration that can tell whether or
not the tool chain it supports is installed.
Leo
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 4:32 PM
To: CDT
General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] MBS
Question
Thanks guys. I had a
feeling this would be difficult. And it actually points out that I should be
enumerating the versions that I support and make sure that the options are
appropriately defined for those versions. I can use isToolChainSupported to
make sure I have that version installed, which I assume is the way it was
intended to work J.
Thanks again!
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sennikovsky,
Mikhail
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 1:24 PM
To: CDT
General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] MBS
Question
Hi Leo,
Correct me if I’m
wrong, but it seems that the current multi version support does not provide the
capability for dynamic calculation of the tool-chains really installed on the
system. But what it does is allows converting from one tool-chain to another
based upon the converter info defined without taking into account whether or
not the tool-chain is installed on the system or not.
Mikhail
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Treggiari,
Leo
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 9:07 PM
To: CDT
General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] MBS
Question
Hi Doug,
I can’t remember
anyone trying to implement a dynamic list of enumerated options, but it
probably can be done. The Option class has an enumList member that
contains the list of enumerated values. You could probably modify the
list after your tool-chain was loaded.
Ø
Alternatively, did we
ever add the ability for an ISV to add in a customer edit dialog for an option?
No.
Ø
We have a few different
versions of our compiler that may be installed on the user’s system at
any time.
MBS does have
“multi-version” support. This is a somewhat
“heavy-weight” mechanism and is appropriate when the versions
support different options.
I also defined
a “multi-instance” support a while back (2 yrs ago?) which is
lighter weight and appropriate when the versions use the same option pages, but
this has not been implemented.
Regards,
Leo
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 12:31
PM
To: CDT
General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] MBS Question
Hey gang, for this
e-mail, I’ve put on my QNX software developer hat and I have a question
on MBS. And, yes, this may be a newsgroup question J,
but it is also more an ISV question.
We have a few different
versions of our compiler that may be installed on the user’s system at
any time. I know how to dynamically get the list of installed versions and I
want to present that list in a tools option on the compiler so the user can
select which version to use. Is there a way to dyanically fill out the list of
enumeration values. Alternatively, did we ever add the ability for an ISV to
add in a customer edit dialog for an option?
Thanks, and sorry for
sounding like a newbie J.
Doug Schaefer, QNX
Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead,
Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com