[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 3.0 Closing
|
Title: Message
I would agree that 3.0 is not quite as stable as 2.1.1. The bug
that's most noticable for me is 102396. 2.1.1 doesn't have this
problem...at least it doesn't for me. Despite this, I continue to use
3.0.
-Dan
-----Original Message-----
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
David Daoust
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:00 AM
To:
Chetan Raj; CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT
3.0 Closing
There will be a What's new document for CDT 3.0 soon.
In the meantime, check the CDT 3.0 development plan, or bugzilla to see
which defects have been addressed .
If 3.0 is not as stable as 2.1.1 for you, please raise defects on the
problems. In general the committers have the belief that 3.0 is
much more stable than 2.0 (other than the C++ browsing perspective).
You are free to remain on any release
that works for you. Obviously the upgrade decision should be based on
your ability to use the software to accomplish your goals :-) I
would suggest that everybody move to 3.0 and provide feedback on its
shortcomings -- otherwise CDT will not get any better for your
purposes.
There are no plans to
make CDT 2.X run on Eclipse 3.1
- Dave
