From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Treggiari, Leo
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 8:11
AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Feedback on
"Multiple Tool Inputs and Outputs design"
Hi Chris,
A primary output does need to be
specified. The additional (non-primary) outputs also need to be
specified, if they are inputs to other tools. This would allow
these secondary outputs to be “silent” as far as the command line
is concerned. How do your tools handle the primary output? Does it
appear on the command line?
Leo
From:
cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Recoskie, Chris
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 7:52
AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Feedback on
"Multiple Tool Inputs and Outputs design"
>Would it meet your needs if
primaryOutput=False and option not specified
>meant to not add the output file to
the command line at all?
Won’t this mess up the dependency
rules then if there is no primary output? You also need this so that MBS
can determine the build artifact.
___________________________________________
Chris Recoskie
Texas Instruments, Toronto