Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Bugzilla 69063,79877

Well, source navigation is always at or near the top of our list of things 
to work on. We'll take these bugzilla requests into consideration when 
making our plans.

Doug Schaefer, IBM's Technical Lead, Eclipse CDT
Ottawa Lab, IBM Canada, Rational Software Division

Thomas Fletcher <ThomasF@xxxxxxx> 
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
12/21/2004 08:07 AM
Please respond to


RE: [cdt-dev] Bugzilla 69063,79877

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Leon Pollak
> Sent: December 21, 2004 7:18 AM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Bugzilla 69063,79877
> Please, forgive me for the interfering.
> I personally think that all the parser problems (source 
> navigation) are of the first importance, as these are the 
> things that a programmer use very very extensively. 
> Many of the features/enhancements I see mentioned in the plan 
> are very good and nice, but we as a programmers learned to 
> live somehow (OK, OK, not so
> comfortable) without them by doing these manually. These are 
> not big problems, as they occur relatively rare.
> Even the speed is not so important IMHO, just it should work.

> Also the following search/navigation options on an identifier 
> XXX may be very
> useful:
> - find all references to XXX
> - find all local references to XXX
> - find all writes to XXX
> - find all reads of XXX
> Again, sorry if my break-in is not in the place.


  I'm assuming that this is a reply to the CDT 3.0 plan proposal.
If that is the case, it is no problem to voice your opinion(s) on
the matter. 

  That said however, those opinions only put something on the proposal
list.  It is likely to get deferred if there isn't someone willing to
"sponsor" the work by stepping up and committing resources to make it

cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top