[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Idea on cvs project creation
|
No --
these would get set up as well. It's just that webmaster has not had a
chance to start on the bugzilla
part
yet (I guess this would further delay it, but that's not a good reason not
to do the proposal below if we think
it's
the right thing to do).
Seb
If
we do this, does it mean that the bugzilla changes and associated mailing
lists (inboxes) for components won't be setup?
Kleo
Sebastien Marineau
<sebastien@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
19/04/2004 01:51 PM
|
|
To
| "'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [cdt-dev] Idea on
cvs project creation |
|
That's what other projects have done and I think it would make it a
lot
easier and flexible.
There are a few drawbacks like disruption
of currently checked-out src, but
that
is something we can manage given
that we can probably reach the majority
of affected folks through the NG
and mailing list.
If we want to do this, we should decide quickly --
Mike (Eclipse webmaster)
is still
working on the commiter changes we
submitted a while back, but is nearly
done
phase 1 (e.g. the
commiter/project rationalization but not the bugzilla
changes). We
can
probably still switch to your scheme before he commits his changes, but
he
may not
be too happy about it... better now than later
though.
Sebastien
> -----Original Message-----
>
From: Douglas Schaefer [mailto:dschaefe@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday,
April 19, 2004 1:30 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:
[cdt-dev] Idea on cvs project creation
>
>
> Hey
gang,
>
> It seems our cvs project creation requests seem to flow
into
> the ether or
> at best, take forever to get implemented.
Here's a thought I
> had after
> talking with one of the Eclipse
PDE people. One thing we could do is
> create CVS projects for each of
the committer groups: e.g. cdt-core,
> cdt-debug, etc. and then put our
plugin projects under them.
> This would
> then allow committers
to create new plugins or features by
> themselves.
> Aside from
the disruption of current checkouts, is there anything
> fundamentally
wrong with this approach? Thoughts/opinions? Anyone?
>
> Doug
Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
> Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario,
Canada
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev
mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing
list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
