[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Re: [cdt-patch] Applied - fix for bug#44507 Outline Flickers with CDT1.2 RC0
|
I am interested to see what people @ QNX think ... the sooner we figure
out what patches go into 1.2.1, the less merge conflicts we shall have.
JohnC
cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/21/2003 09:52:02 AM:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have applied this patch on the HEAD only. I don't
> know if it should go to the 1.2.1 stream or not.
> In general, what is the policy of bug solutions in 1.
> 2.1? Do we vote on things going there? or do we
> submit all what we can fix there?
>
> Thanks,
> Hoda Amer
> Staff Software Engineer
> Rational Software - IBM Software Group
>
>
>
> Hoda Amer/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
> Sent by: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 10/20/2003 05:21 PM
> Please respond to cdt-patch
>
>
> To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc:
> Subject: [cdt-patch] Applied - fix for
> bug#44507 Outline Flickers with CDT1.2 RC0
>
>
>
>
>
> Alain,
> I hope this solves the problem. I made sure that re-
> drawing occurs only if there was a real change in thedocument.
>
> Core :
> Returned a boolean from IWorkingCopy.
> reconcile() indicating
> if there was a real change.
> UI:
> In CReconcilingStrategy, the outliner is
> asked to redraw only
> if there was a real change.
>
>
>
> Hoda Amer
> Staff Software Engineer
> Rational Software - IBM Software Group
>
>
>
>
> "Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
> Sent by: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 10/20/2003 01:49 PM
> Please respond to cdt-patch
>
>
> To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc:
> Subject: Re: [cdt-patch] Solution to
> bug#43524 : Removing a define from a .c file
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Alain,
> > I have a solution to this problem.
> > The previous handling ignored reconciling in some
> cases, which was not
> > correct.
> > Actually, you get a reconcile for every region
> once, but the redraw draws
> > the whole thing.
> > The proper thing to do is to redraw only if we
> have a real change.
> > Give me until tomorrow and I will submit the solution.
> >
>
> Of course!! no stress.
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-patch mailing list
> cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
>
>
>
>
>
> #### core.oct.20.txt has been removed from this note
> on October 21, 2003 by Hoda Amer
> #### ui.oct.20.txt has been removed from this note on
> October 21, 2003 by Hoda Amer
