[cdt-dev] Torture tests (was Re: Applied [HEAD]: Second attempt at [cdt-

["Victor Mozgin" <vic_mozgin@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

        That was the idea. I took some time to analyze ~400 failures we had before, and added filters for the things that are not relevant. Now all these ~100 failures are real problems that need to be fixed. All of them are reported in bugzilla (you've probably seen ~25 new parser/scanner PRs ;) ), except some template instantiation/specialization cases I am not sure about. So after all these cases are resolved, the failure count will be about zero. I am planning to add simplified tests for these PRs into FailedTests, so it won't be necessary to run TortureTest all the time.

        Now, question: what C/C++ variants do we want to support in CDT? For instance, there are K&R C, C89/C90, C94/C95, C9X/C99. C99 has several features that CDT does not support yet...

 

        /Vic

----- Original Message -----

From: John Camelon

To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 8:51 PM

Subject: Applied [HEAD]: Second attempt at [cdt-patch] Fix for PR 39501

Thanks for the help Victor.  That fix gets us down to under 100 failures out of ~6900 tests in TortureTest.  
I try and run TortureTest in quick parse mode on a regular basis now, I look forward to when we can get the failure count down to zero so that I can include it in my regression for validating parser patches.

JohnC

"Victor Mozgin" <vic_mozgin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/03/2003 01:23 PM

Please respond to
cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx

To	<cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: Rejected: [cdt-patch] Fix for PR 39501

        That wasn't difficult (it wasn't used anyway). But are platform requirements documented? Is it 1.3 that should be supported, or anything earlier, or?..
 
            /Vic
----- Original Message -----
From: John Camelon
To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: Rejected: [cdt-patch] Fix for PR 39501


I'm sorry Victor, I cannot apply this patch.  In the core.tests you use java.util.regexp which is exclusively a Java 1.4 package.  
As far as I know, we still have to support Java 1.3.  

Hopefully it won't be too hard for you to fix ...

JohnC

"Victor Mozgin" <vic_mozgin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/02/2003 12:00 PM

Please respond to
cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx

To	<cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[cdt-patch] Fix for PR 39501

   - Fixed PR 39501 : Parser problems with throw clauses.
  - Improved filtering of expected failures/inconclusives in TortureTest.

          /Vic[attachment "core20030702.patch" deleted by John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM] [attachment "core.tests20030702.patch" deleted by John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM]