[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDI proposals (on the wiki)
|
There are two reasons why I didn't apply (a):
- the main reason: it's two big to apply it without going through the
legal procedure, i.e. fill the questionnaire, submit it to the Eclipse
legal department and wait for permission.
- I was thinking to add an extension point to allow clients to
contribute custom types instead of extending the CDI. It would be great
if we implement all C/C++ specific types as contributions and make the
base of CDI language independent. I think it's doable
(b) my proposal doesn't cover all changes. See for example the following
bugs:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=122013
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=84934
These are minor changes.
But we should also consider to use the source lookup capabilities and
access to the symbol information provided by the backend.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alain Magloire
Sent: 24 October 2006 15:50
To: CDT Debug developers list
Subject: [cdt-debug-dev] CDI proposals (on the wiki)
Bonjour,
(a) Consider adding to the proposal, this PR by Matthias Spycher:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=126092
It is a non-compatible change.
(b) Also add CDI interface will now use the org.eclipse.* namespace
So IAdaptable, IPath and all
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
--
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
