[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-debug-dev] List of Plan items
|
John,
I don't know if my answers will satisfy you,
but I'll try.
1. If you need IAdaptable you can add it to your
implementation and check if your object is instance of
IAdaptable.
2. Regarding the history, the idea was to create a pure
(non Eclipse) interface. Eclipse wasn't very stable at that time and the
Debug API had just changed very seriously (Eclipse 1.0 ->
2.0).
Regards,
Mikhail
At 12:58 PM 10/16/2006, Alain Magloire wrote:
I do not see any difficulty except
that it will break backward compatibility
but since this is targeting a
major release, it should not be a problem.
Hm. I'd like to
stop for a second and discuss this point. Is it true that we should be OK with
breaking CDI compatibility in 4.0? We're working on various features (which we
will contribute for 4.0) where we go out of the way to
not break
compatibility, by, e.g., introducing an ICDIThread2. If we're looking at
breaking compatibility anyway, then there's no point in use going this messier
route.
The other thing, is that we did not
want to bring org.eclipse.* namespace in
to the interface so we
could;
I'm with Pawel--in need of a history lesson. Why is
this?
John
--
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
