Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-debug-dev] Is there a way to turn off stack tracing ?

OK.  I'm not very familiar with GDB, but I would assume that if the
frame limit was set to one then it wouldn't actually decode the stack.
It would merely grab the current PC.  

Thanks,
Warren

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Mikhail
Khodjaiants
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:59 AM
To: CDT Debug developers list
Subject: Re: [cdt-debug-dev] Is there a way to turn off stack tracing ?

Warren,

I agree that we should add this feature. Currently the frame limit value
is 100 and it is hardcoded.
But this is not a solution for this particular case. As far as I
understand they are using a gdb version that crashes when the
"backtrace" command is issued.

Mikhail
----- Original Message -----
From: <Warren.Paul@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:03 PM
Subject: RE: [cdt-debug-dev] Is there a way to turn off stack tracing ?


> I'd like to see something like this as well.  Perhaps we should enter
a
> feature request on the debug platform for a frame limit.  It would be
> disabled by default but the user could enable it in the prefs and set
> the limit to whatever he wants (1-N).  We have something similar in
our
> debugger and it can really help performance with remote debugging when
> there are many frames.  Setting it to 5 or so usually gives you what
you
> need anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> Warren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Kim Lux
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:12 PM
> To: CDT Debug developers list
> Subject: Re: [cdt-debug-dev] Is there a way to turn off stack tracing
?
>
> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 12:41 -0500, Mikhail Khodjaiants wrote:
>> Unfortunately, no.
>
> I figured as much and I understand why too.  Just thought I'd ask.
>
> Thanks for replying.
>
>
> --
> Kim Lux,  Diesel Research Inc.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-debug-dev mailing list
> cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-debug-dev mailing list
> cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev 

_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev


Back to the top