[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-debug-dev] address spaces
|
I'm not sure that I'm getting it right, but we use "IAddress" to represent
an address in CDT. We would need to modify the address presentation parts,
but that's a minor thing. Or there is something more generic that I'm
missing?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cortell" <r4609c@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "CDT Debug developers list" <cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "CDT Debug
developers list" <cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [cdt-debug-dev] address spaces
As per my description, this issue goes beyond the Memory Window. Please
see
my description of the "complete" support level.
John
At 11:29 AM 6/8/2005, Mikhail Khodjaiants wrote:
It would be better to post this questions to the platform mailing list
(platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx). The Memory View implementation in CDT
is
based on the platform framework and UI. The modifications to support
address spaces should be done in the platform.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cortell" <r4609c@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:44 PM
Subject: [cdt-debug-dev] address spaces
> Has there been any meaningful discussions on adding support for
address
> spaces in Eclipse/CDT? I understand this was brought up as an item
in
> the
> Chicago meeting last month. The way we see it, there are two levels
of
> support:
>
> - superficial : user can view the contents of memory in different
> address
> spaces in the Memory View.
>
> - complete : variables, expressions and code locations can be in
> different
> address spaces. For this level of support, the debugger
infrastructure
> would need to use something other than a primitive integer type to
> represent a memory address. A particular location in memory would
have
> to
> be represented by an address + address space identifier.
>
> I understand the need for this sort of thing is particular to the
> embedded
> world. Still, if CDT is to be considered a viable platform for the
> embedded
> market, address spaces will need to be considered.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-debug-dev mailing list
> cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev>https://dev.ecli
pse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev>https://dev.ecl
ipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
