Re: [cdt-debug-dev] MIParser Change

[Chris Songer <songer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 12:39 PM 6/25/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> Very cool ... with one havoc .. your patch is reversed  8-)

Whoops, sorry about that!

> Yes, speed/performance was not part of the equation, but rather getting
> the parsing protocol MI right.  But now its a good time to look at the issue.

I certainly was not complaining, we (I actually) just had to fix it, so I 
figured I'd send mail out. Makes a huge difference on the java side, now if 
GDB were not so slow. We are seeing array retrieval at the rate of about 
750 entries/second on a fast Linux machine. That makes opening anything 16k 
or over blow the default timeout.

Thanks!
-Chris