Re: [cdt-core-dev] CDT ResolverModel vs ContentTypeManager

["Treggiari, Leo" <leo.treggiari@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Alain,

What is your current thinking on this?  It looks like Eclipse will
support saving content types per project in M6.  Will Eclipse have a UI
for adding/removing filenames/extensions in content types, or will CDT
still have to implement the UI?  If CDT implements the UI, will it
support modifications to all content types - i.e., not just ones that we
decide are C/C++ content types?

The reason that I ask is that in the MBS we are switching to using
content types for Tool inputs and outputs.  I work like the user to be
able to modify the extensions assigned to any content type used by a
Tool, not just the C/C++ content types.

Thanks,
Leo

==================================================================

Leo,
  there is an interesting PR about conten-type:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=69640

Is to be able to specify a content-type per Nature "good enough" for
your needs ?

I would really like to remove the ResolverModel from the CDT, the
problem:
It does not play along with Eclipse. So far, in the head, as a quick fix
the information
the CDT Resolver Model holds is duplicate on the ContentTypeManager ..
but it would
be nice to have one API and fully integrate with Eclipse.


So we have

+1 Doug
-1 Leo 

Any other feedbaks, it would be nice to resolve for CDT M5



_______________________________________________
cdt-core-dev mailing list
cdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-core-dev