RE: [cdt-core-dev] CDT ResolverModel vs ContentTypeManager

["Treggiari, Leo" <leo.treggiari@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Alain,

> a) The content-type mappings are global i.e. it can not be set on
> a per project basis.
> But so far, I've not see a real case where it is usefull.
> Note: there is an enhancement PR for this.

Will this enhancement be done in Eclipse 3.1?  Will CDT drop the
per-project file extension associations if it is not?  I would not like
to see the functionality dropped.  Developers can find themselves
working with someone else's code where "strange" file extensions are
used, but not necessarily want these extensions to be valid in the
projects that they create.

Regards,
Leo