Done. I called the branch NewParser1
since there really isn't very much left of the Open C++ parser other than
most of the grammar. They still deserve the copyright notice for the
Parser class, however. I'll put the new work in the source folder 'newparser'
so you can easily find it. This will happen over the next few days as we
clean up our prototype to make it more presentable. It should be under
the tree for Christmas ;-)
Doug Schaefer
Senior Staff Software Engineer
Rational - the software development
company
Ottawa (Kanata), Ontario, Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: Schaefer, Doug
[mailto:dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002
9:39 PM
To: 'cdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [cdt-core-dev] Open
C++ Parser
That's a great idea, Alain. I'll give it a shot.
Doug Schaefer
Senior Staff Software Engineer
Rational - the software development
company
Ottawa (Kanata), Ontario, Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Magloire [mailto:alain@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002
7:38 PM
To: cdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-core-dev] Open
C++ Parser
>
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> We're having a lot of fun here
porting the Open C++ parser to Java for
> potential use in the
CDT. We've started parsing some basic things like
> stdio.h and performance up
until now seems to be reasonable.
>
>
>
> However, before we get too
far, people on the conference call on Monday
> mentioned they had experience
with the Open C++ parser and were willing to
> share that with us. If
you were one of those persons, could you please drop
> us a line. I have made
some changes to make the parser do what we want
> including: our own handwritten
scanner that also handles pre-processor
> directives, using exceptions
for backtracking, replacing the Ptree with our
> own JDT-like AST, amongst
other minor changes. In the end, we're really
> only using the grammar and the
strategy of handwriting the parser. And it
> seems to be working although
there is a lot of testing that needs to go
> on...
>
I would propose, if that can make things easier for
you, to make a
branch, openc-cpp or something.
This would be a developement
branch. Then we can merge it back or not.
_______________________________________________
cdt-core-dev mailing list
cdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-core-dev
