[cdt-core-dev] Re: Patch for gdb/mi problem 702

["Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>]

> 
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Alain Magloire wrote:
> 
> > Yes, as J. Johnston was saying, it was more in the case:
> > you write to a memory, the memory is actually pointing to some variables.
> > You would want the change events for the variables affected also,
> > We do actually send the ChangeEvent on behalf of gdb in eclipse, but
> > we do not know of the side-effects.
> 
> That's because you're using an older version of gdb. If you were 
> developing on CVS head, you would soon get:
> 

A note:
gdb CVS head branch(5.4?) was not on the map.
We are looking forward to work with it though, some __really__ nice
additions that will make the work on the IDE side better.
Probably the code in org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.core/* will have to
be refactor.

BTW, Is -target-attach implemenented in the head branch?