Re: [cdi-dev] History of/rationale for type closure rules for producer m

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdi-dev] History of/rationale for type closure rules for producer method return types?

From: Piotr Żygieło <piotr.zygielo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 17:22:54 +0200
Delivered-to: cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdi-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>, <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdi-dev>, <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> So, it wasn't guaranteed that arrays implement Cloneable and Serializable interfaces.

Unclear. Since JLS 1.2:
 5.1.7  Forbidden Conversions
 There is no permitted conversion from any array type to any interface
type, except to the interface types java.io.Serializable and
Cloneable, which are implemented by all arrays.
(see also 5.1.4 Widening Reference Conversions there)

Piotrek

References:
- [cdi-dev] History of/rationale for type closure rules for producer method return types?
  - From: Laird Nelson
- Re: [cdi-dev] History of/rationale for type closure rules for producer method return types?
  - From: Ondro Mihályi

Prev by Date: Re: [cdi-dev] History of/rationale for type closure rules for producer method return types?
Next by Date: Re: [cdi-dev] History of/rationale for type closure rules for producer method return types?
Previous by thread: Re: [cdi-dev] History of/rationale for type closure rules for producer method return types?
Next by thread: Re: [cdi-dev] History of/rationale for type closure rules for producer method return types?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs