|Re: [cbi-dev] CBI work, relation to dash-dev and Minerva|
[Sorry... this bounced when I sent it on Friday]
I've created a wiki page to capture information about the CBI. It's very much a work-in-progress.
Feel free to edit as you see fit.
Some comments inline.
On 12/16/2011 10:16 AM, Paul Webster wrote:
Hi all,The CBI is evolving and will continue to evolve. From a technology point-of-view, the CBI is based on the stack of Hudson, Maven, and Tycho. As the work being done in the Dash project evolves, pieces of it will be absorbed into the CBI. As gaps are identified, we will take steps to fill them.
I agree. maven.eclipse.org, or something like it needs to be part of CBI.
4) just a general comment. As we've seen recently, sharing and/or promoting repos as part of the builds when Hudson is involved is quite convoluted/error prone. But building a number of repos and sharing them either within one build or between multiple build jobs is a requirement (even now, and probably more important if we do get to break up the main Eclipse SDK build into smaller builds). Should we be able to recommend a best practice for this on the Eclipse Foundation hardware?Best practices are part of this. So yes.
Back to the top