| Hi, 
 I changed my mind, again.
 I got back to my first idea, that is to say, rely on the XPath
    editor. But we must definitely drop the idea of embedding editors in
    a composite. This is a dead end. It is not intended for that.
 To avoid spending too much time on it, I used a styled text with the
    XPath source viewer configuration. It means we won't have
    auto-completion and so on for the moment. But we have syntax
    highlighting, which is a poor first step.
 
 As a user (I'm using this tool too), this is not good at all.
 However, it should be possible to add context assistance in a second
    step. The reason why I can't do it right now is that it requires to
    refactor the XPath editor and externalize some internal classes (and
    I don't have time for this).
 In a more general matter, I think all the XPath stuff should be
    externalized in a distinct plugin. It is not the first time I use
    the XPath source configuration, it goes beyond the scope of BPEL.
 
 Then, we could have an extensibility mechanism based on source
    viewer configurations instead of editors.
 I have no idea how this would impact XText editors.
 I will push it in a distinct branch this afternoon.
 
 Vincent.
 
 
 
 Le 21/05/2012 20:39, Bob Brodt a écrit :
 
      
      Hi Vincent,
 Thanks for working on this. Before you leave, please drop me a
        quick email and let me know where we are with this - I can
        continue working on it and hopefully get a successful build
        again.
 
 Bob
 
 
 |