| Re: [aspectj-users] Is it possible to abstract away the subject type in the declare parents statement? |
Hi, At the moment, no. What you need are named type patterns, which aren't implemented yet. I thought we had an open bugzilla for it - but I can't quite find it right now... They would provide exactly what you describe. typepattern foo(): @LogMe *; (or 'abstract typepattern foo();') then declare parents: foo() implements Serializable; cheers, Andy On 7 December 2011 11:43, Mark <mark.kharitonov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Consider the following abstract aspect: > > > Is it possible to abstract (@LogMe *) away, behind a type pattern > declaration, that could be overridden in a derived aspect? > > -- > View this message in context: http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-abstract-away-the-subject-type-in-the-declare-parents-statement-tp4170237p4170237.html > Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users